Dieter, C. A. et al. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015 Circular 1441 (US Geological Survey, 2018).
Today in energy. US Energy Information Administration https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36773 (2018).
Zhai, H., Rubin, E. S. & Versteeg, P. L. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2479–2485 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tidwell, V. C., Moreland, B. D., Shaneyfelt, C. R. & Kobos, P. Mapping water availability, cost and projected consumptive use in the eastern United States with comparisons to the west. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 014023 (2018).
Google Scholar
Woodhouse, C. A. et al. Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: plausible scenarios for the future. Clim. Serv. 21, 100206 (2021).
Google Scholar
Byers, E. A., Coxon, G., Freer, J. & Hall, J. W. Drought and climate change impacts on cooling water shortages and electricity prices in Great Britain. Nat. Commun. 11, 2239 (2020).
Google Scholar
McCall, J. & Macknick, J. Water-Related Power Plant Curtailments: An Overview of Incidents and Contributing Factors NREL/TP-6A20-67084 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2016).
Zhai, H. et al. Dry cooling retrofits at existing fossil fuel-fired power plants in a water-stressed region: tradeoffs in water savings, cost, and capacity shortfalls. Appl. Energy 306, 117997 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhai, H. & Rubin, E. S. Performance and cost of wet and dry cooling systems for pulverized coal power plants with and without carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 38, 5653–5660 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zhai, H. & Rubin, E. S. A techno-economic assessment of hybrid cooling systems for coal- and natural-gas-fired power plants with and without carbon capture and storage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4127–4134 (2016).
Google Scholar
Childress, A. et al. National Alliance for Water Innovation (NAWI) Power Sector Technology Roadmap 2021 NREL/TP-6A20-79894 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2021).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Can we beneficially reuse produced water from oil and gas extraction in the US? Sci. Total Environ. 717, 137085 (2020).
Google Scholar
Harto, C., Finster, M., Schroeder, J. & Clark, C. Saline Water for Power Plant Cooling: Challenges and Opportunities ANL/EVS-14/15 (Argonne National Laboratory, 2014).
Munson, R., Murphy, J. & Walsh, K. Use of Non-Traditional Water for Power Plant Applications: An Overview of DOE/NETL R&D Efforts DOE/NETL-311/040609 (Science Applications International and Research Development Solutions, 2009).
Stillwell, A. S. & Webber, M. E. Geographic, technologic, and economic analysis of using reclaimed water for thermoelectric power plant cooling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4588–4595 (2014).
Google Scholar
Municipal Wastewater Reuse by Electric Utilities: Best Practices and Future Directions Workshop Report (Water Environment Federation and American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012).
Stanton, J. S. et al. Brackish Groundwater in the United States Professional Paper 1833 (US Geological Survey, 2017).
Kahsar, R. The potential for brackish water use in thermoelectric power generation in the American southwest. Energy Policy 137, 111170 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tidwell, V. C., Macknick, J., Zemlick, K., Sanchez, J. & Woldeyesus, T. Transitioning to zero freshwater withdrawal in the US for thermoelectric generation. Appl. Energy 131, 508–516 (2014).
Google Scholar
Vane, L. M., Rock, K. & Jordan, D. Energy efficient vortex-enhanced water evaporation technology for concentrated brine management: theory and process simulation evaluation. Desalination 522, 115427 (2022).
Google Scholar
Soliman, M. N. et al. Energy consumption and environmental impact assessment of desalination plants and brine disposal strategies. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 147, 589–608 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elsaid, K. et al. Environmental impact of emerging desalination technologies: a preliminary evaluation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 8, 104099 (2020).
Google Scholar
Regulatory and guidance information by topic: water. US Environmental Protection Agency https://www.epa.gov/regulatory-information-topic/regulatory-and-guidance-information-topic-water#drinking (2021).
Permitting requirements for brine disposal methods. Arizona Department of Water Resources and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality https://new.azwater.gov/sites/default/files/GWAICC_DesalinationCommittee_BrinePermittingFactSheet_Final_0.pdf (2020).
Panagopoulos, A. & Haralambous, K. J. Environmental impacts of desalination and brine treatment—challenges and mitigation measures. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 161, 111773 (2020).
Google Scholar
Voutchkov, N. Desalination Engineering: Planning and Design (McGraw Hill Professional, 2012).
Shemer, H. & Semiat, R. Sustainable RO desalination—energy demand and environmental impact. Desalination 424, 10–16 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tong, T. & Elimelech, M. The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 6846–6855 (2016).
Google Scholar
Arena, J. T. et al. Management and dewatering of brines extracted from geologic carbon storage sites. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 63, 194–214 (2017).
Google Scholar
Curto, D., Franzitta, V. & Guercio, A. A review of the water desalination technologies. Appl. Sci. 11, 670 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. & Liu, X. Forward osmosis technology for water treatment: recent advances and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124354 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cooley, H., Gleick, P. H. & Wolff, G. Desalination, with A Grain of Salt (Pacific Institute, 2006).
Ahdab, Y. D. & Lienhard, J. H. in Global Groundwater (eds Mukherjee, A. et al.) 559–575 (Elsevier, 2021).
Jones, E., Qadir, M., van Vliet, M. T., Smakhtin, V. & Kang, S. M. The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1343–1356 (2019).
Google Scholar
Al-Karaghouli, A. & Kazmerski, L. L. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24, 343–356 (2013).
Google Scholar
Park, C., Lee, H., Hwang, Y. & Radermacher, R. Recent advances in vapor compression cycle technologies. Int. J. Refrig. 60, 118–134 (2015).
Google Scholar
Use of Degraded Water Sources as Cooling Water in Power Plants (EPRI and California Energy Commission, 2003).
Central Arizona Salinity Study. Phase II—Brackish Groundwater (US Bureau of Reclamation, 2006).
Sullivan-Graham, J. Brackish and saline groundwater in New Mexico. New Mexico Earth Matters https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/periodicals/earthmatters/15/n2/em_v15_n2.pdf (New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 2015).
Utton Center. in Water Matters! Ch. 14 (University of New Mexico School of Law, 2015).
Electricity data browser. US Energy Information Administration https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/ (2022).
Xu, X. et al. Analysis of brackish water desalination for municipal uses: case studies on challenges and opportunities. ACS EST Eng. 2, 306–322 (2022).
Google Scholar
Micari, M. et al. Techno-economic assessment of multi-effect distillation process for the treatment and recycling of ion exchange resin spent brines. Desalination 456, 38–52 (2019).
Google Scholar
Birnhack, L., Keller, O., Tang, S. C., Fridman-Bishop, N. & Lahav, O. A membrane-based recycling process for minimizing environmental effects inflicted by ion-exchange softening applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 223, 24–30 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022 (US Geological Survey, 2022); https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/mcs2022
Neofotistou, E. & Demadis, K. D. Use of antiscalants for mitigation of silica (SiO2) fouling and deposition: fundamentals and applications in desalination systems. Desalination 167, 257–272 (2004).
Google Scholar
Yaqub, M. & Lee, W. Zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) technology for resource recovery from wastewater: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 681, 551–563 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wenzlick, M. & Siefert, N. Techno-economic analysis of converting oil and gas produced water into valuable resources. Desalination 481, 114381 (2020).
Google Scholar
de Graaf, I. E., Gleeson, T., Van Beek, L., Sutanudjaja, E. H. & Bierkens, M. F. Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature 574, 90–94 (2019).
Google Scholar
Water Application Value Engine (WAVE) v1.82. DuPontTM https://www.dupont.com/water/resources/design-software.html (2021).
Brackish groundwater assessment. US Geological Survey https://water.usgs.gov/ogw/gwrp/brackishgw/brackish.html (2017).
Tidwell, V. & Jeffers, R. Water atlas features database. US Department of Energy https://doi.org/10.18141/1756186 (2021).
ArcGIS Pro 3.0. Esri https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.0/get-started/download-arcgis-pro.htm (2022).
Carpenter, Z., Chakalian, G. & Bushnell, D. S. A Water Rights Manual for Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Associations (Utton Center, University of New Mexico School of Law, Alberquerque, 2013).
Water in the West. Groundwater permitting in the West. Stanford University https://groundwater.stanford.edu/dashboard/region.html (2016).
Wells 55. Arizona Department of Water Resource https://azwatermaps.azwater.gov/wellreg (2021).
POD locations. New Mexico Office of the State Engineer https://gis.ose.state.nm.us/gisapps/ose_pod_locations/ (2021).
Vidic, R. et al. Reuse of Treated Internal or External Wastewaters in the Cooling Systems of Coal-Based Thermoelectric Power Plants (University of Pittsburgh, 2009).
Secondary drinking water standards: guidance for nuisance chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nuisance-chemicals (2021).
Plata, S. L. et al. Zero liquid discharge and water reuse in recirculating cooling towers at power facilities: review and case study analysis. ACS EST Eng. 2, 508–525 (2022).
Google Scholar
Singh, R. Membrane Technology and Engineering for Water Purification: Application, Systems Design and Operation (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014).
Poulson, T. Strategic Alternatives for Brine Management in the Valley of the Sun (Central Arizona Salinity Study, 2010).
eMaps. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality https://azdeq.gov/emaps (2023).
Product Data Sheet. FilmTec™ Eco Pro-440i Elements. Form No. 45-D01715-en, Rev. 2. DuPont™ https://www.dupont.com/products/filmtececopro440i.html (2020).
Zhai, H. & Rubin, E. S. Techno-economic assessment of polymer membrane systems for postcombustion carbon capture at coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3006–3014 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhai, H. & Rubin, E. S. Systems analysis of physical absorption of CO2 in ionic liquids for pre-combustion carbon capture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 4996–5004 (2018).
Google Scholar
Integrated Environmental Control Model (IECM) v11.4. Carnegie Mellon Univ. http://www.iecm-online.com/ (2020).
Islam, M., Sultana, A., Saadat, A., Shammi, M. & Uddin, M. Desalination technologies for developing countries: a review. J. Sci. Res. 10, 77–97 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tripathy, D. B., Murmu, M., Banerjee, P. & Quraishi, M. A. Palmitic acid based environmentally benign corrosion inhibiting formulation useful during acid cleansing process in MSF desalination plants. Desalination 472, 114128 (2019).
Google Scholar
Al-Othman, A., Tawalbeh, M., Assad, M. E. H., Alkayyali, T. & Eisa, A. Novel multi-stage flash (MSF) desalination plant driven by parabolic trough collectors and a solar pond: a simulation study in UAE. Desalination 443, 237–244 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, D., Hu, B. & Wang, R. Vapor compression heat pumps with pure low-GWP refrigerants. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110571 (2021).
Google Scholar
She, X. et al. Energy-efficient and -economic technologies for air conditioning with vapor compression refrigeration: a comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 232, 157–186 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pan, S. Y., Haddad, A. Z., Kumar, A. & Wang, S. W. Brackish water desalination using reverse osmosis and capacitive deionization at the water-energy nexus. Water Res. 183, 116064 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vince, F., Marechal, F., Aoustin, E. & Bréant, P. Multi-objective optimization of RO desalination plants. Desalination 222, 96–118 (2008).
Google Scholar
Patel, S. K., Biesheuvel, P. M. & Elimelech, M. Energy consumption of brackish water desalination: identifying the sweet spots for electrodialysis and reverse osmosis. ACS EST Eng. 1, 851–864 (2021).
Google Scholar
Karabelas, A., Koutsou, C., Kostoglou, M. & Sioutopoulos, D. Analysis of specific energy consumption in reverse osmosis desalination processes. Desalination 431, 15–21 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ruiz-García, A. & de la Nuez Pestana, I. Feed spacer geometries and permeability coefficients. Effect on the performance in BWRO spriral-wound membrane modules. Water 11, 152 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alsarayreh, A. A., Al-Obaidi, M., Al-Hroub, A., Patel, R. & Mujtaba, I. M. Evaluation and minimisation of energy consumption in a medium-scale reverse osmosis brackish water desalination plant. J. Clean. Prod. 248, 119220 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hamed, O. A. in Corrosion and Fouling Control in Desalination Industry (eds Saji, V. S. et al.) 29–47 (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020).
Feria-Díaz, J. J., López-Méndez, M. C., Rodríguez-Miranda, J. P., Sandoval-Herazo, L. C. & Correa-Mahecha, F. Commercial thermal technologies for desalination of water from renewable energies: a state of the art review. Processes 9, 262 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wenten, I. G. Reverse osmosis applications: prospect and challenges. Desalination 391, 112–125 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mohammadi, R., Tang, W. & Sillanpää, M. A systematic review and statistical analysis of nutrient recovery from municipal wastewater by electrodialysis. Desalination 498, 114626 (2021).
Google Scholar